Now, some of you are probably aware that Christianity has had no small measure of debate about
how God is present among us in the Supper. In broadly Roman Catholic Austria in 2021, I think it is important that you are informed about these things, even if I cannot do any of these debates justice right now. The most obvious error concerning the Lord’s Table is that of the Roman Catholic Church. The
official Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church describes the Lord’s Supper as an act that represents - read more like
re-presents rather than symbolically represents - Christ’s sacrifice in the present time. When the priest delivers a prayer, the bread and the wine at that point only appear to be bread and wine but are transfigured into the actual body and blood of the Lord. Therefore, the Roman Mass is, at its heart,
sacrificial. This is a blasphemy that disparages the fact that Christ has finished his work of propitiation, and it serves as a grounding to make Catholics dependent upon a mediated grace from the Roman Church. The Roman Catholic Church seeks to repudiate the biblical gospel of justification by faith alone and usurp Christ as the sole justifier of the saints.
During the Protestant Reformation, the Reformers Martin Luther and Ulrich Zwingli couldn’t agree on how to respond to the papists on this matter. When the two men came together in Marburg, Luther refused to read Christ’s words “this
is my body” meaning anything other than it
was actually his body. I concur with John Hammet when he writes that this is pretty strange. Luther was okay with figurative language in other parts of the Bible, but he refused to adopt an understanding of the elements as symbols of spiritual realities. Nowadays, Lutherans will speak of the Supper as a “sacramental union” where the presence of Christ is “by, with, and under” the sacrament. The
Book of Concord describes this union like two boards that are glued together, inseparable, and somewhat indistinguishable. The biggest problem in this, according to many in the reformed tradition, was that they do not mean Christ is present
by the Spirit and according to the divine nature, but they mean that the
physical nature of Christ, the nature by which Christ endured the Cross, is present at each administration.
At this point, I believe that biblically informed Christians must part ways from the Lutheran understanding of the Supper. At the council of Chalcedon in 451, the Church summarized the biblical understanding of the two natures of Christ with 4 critical negations that serve as guardrails concerning Christ's two natures: “without
confusion (read without intermingling),
without change, without division, and without separation.” The Lutheran view of Sacramental Union
changes Christ’s human nature and
confuses it with his divine nature. Human natures are, by definition, finite - occupying a single space and time. Christ’s human nature is at this moment in Heaven with the Father and nowhere else. Christians do not need a mystical presence of Christ, we need only recognize that Christ is present by His Spirit and in our hearts by our faith.
So, dear Christian, the Lord's Supper is a fellowship meal where we experience God’s presence and fellowship with Him. Yes, it doesn't look that profound; it's just a small piece of bread and a cup of wine. But
by His Spirit and according to your faith, God is in our midst as we dine at His table. Let’s not relegate the Lord’s Table to an afterthought, but let’s rather dwell upon it and look forward to it as the climax of God's presence among us on the Lord's Day.